Reading in the Age of AI
- Giovanni Rottura

- 8 hours ago
- 4 min read

The One Skill No Algorithm Can Hand Us – by Sushil Penuti at ELi Publishing
We have spent two years asking what AI will do to our students. Perhaps we have been asking the wrong question.
The machines can summarise a novel in seconds, answer every comprehension question we set, and write the essay before the bell even rings. So here is the uncomfortable truth I keep returning to as a teacher: if a tool can do the reading for our learners, why would they ever do it themselves?
I think about this most when I remember a boy I taught a few years ago. He had decided, somewhere along the way, that he was “bad at English.” He didn’t read. He survived lessons by nodding at the right moments and copying just enough. Then one week I put a short graded reader in his hands, a real story, pitched exactly at the level he could manage without drowning. Not a textbook. Not a worksheet dressed up as a story. A book.
He finished it. The whole thing. And he came back the next day and asked, almost suspiciously, whether there was another one.
That is the moment. That small, unglamorous, world-changing moment. And it is the one thing no algorithm can hand anyone.
What we are actually protecting
We talk a lot about comprehension as if it were the prize. Decode the words, answer the questions, move on. But comprehension was never the point. The point was the experience of meaning arriving slowly, under your own power. The quiet pride of having built understanding word by word, page by page, instead of being handed it.
When a student asks a chatbot to “explain this story,” they get the information. They do not get the climb. And it’s the climb that changes them, that builds the stamina, the patience, the inner voice that learns to hold a thought across three hundred words instead of three. Reading is not the delivery of content. It is the slow construction of a mind that can sit with something difficult and stay.
Take that away, and we are not making learning easier. We are quietly making learners disappear.
Why level still matters more than ever
Here is where I get a little stubborn. The answer to “my students won’t read” is almost never “make them read harder things.” It’s the opposite. It’s the right book, at the right level, at the right moment.
This is the unglamorous genius of the graded reader. Give a learner a text that’s just slightly above where they are, challenging enough to stretch, gentle enough to finish and something shifts. The book stops being an obstacle and becomes a door. They get the one thing struggling readers almost never get to feel: the feeling of finishing. Of succeeding. Of wanting more.
The ELi Publishing Graded Readers were built on exactly that quiet faith, that a story carefully matched to a learner does more than any amount of forced extension ever could. Not because it’s easy. Because it’s theirs.
What this looks like on a Tuesday
None of this means banning the tools or pretending it’s still 2010. It means building moments into the week where the reading simply has to happen inside the learner, out loud, in the room, with each other. Here are a few that have never let me down, and that no chatbot can sit through on a student’s behalf:
• Reader’s theatre. Pull a scene from the graded reader and have students perform it, scripts in hand, voices doing the work. You cannot act out a story you haven’t read.
• The favourite-line ritual. Before any discussion, each learner reads aloud one sentence they loved, hated, or didn’t understand, and says why. Thirty seconds, and it tells you instantly who actually turned the pages.
• Hot-seating a character. One student becomes a character from the book; the rest interview them. The answers only hold up if you’ve lived inside the story.
• Prediction pauses. Stop mid-chapter. Everyone writes, by hand, what they think happens next and why. Read on. Compare. The “why” is where the real comprehension hides.
• Book speed-dating. Two minutes to convince a classmate to read your reader, then rotate. You can’t fake that pitch from a summary you skimmed.
• Silent reading, devices down. Ten unglamorous minutes. No tasks, no phones, no quiz at the end. Just reading, because reading is allowed to simply be reading.
Notice what these have in common. The proof of the reading lives in the learner, in their voice, their guess, their performance, their pitch. There is no output to paste in, because the point was never the output. It was them.
The radical act
So no, I’m not afraid that AI will read better than my students. I’m afraid we’ll forget why human reading mattered in the first place, and stop asking for it because the machine made it optional.
In an age of instant answers, choosing to read, really read, slowly, all the way to the end has quietly become a radical act. It is one of the few things left that cannot be outsourced without losing the person entirely.
Our job was never to make reading effortless. It was to make it matter. To hand a learner the right story at the right moment and watch them discover that the world opened up because they did the work.
The algorithm can do almost everything now.
It still can’t do that for them. Only we can.
Further Reading
This article was written by Sushil Penuti, ELT Pedagogical Specialist at ELi Publishing, lifelong learner, avid reader, and passionate advocate for the power of reading in language education.






Comments